Compatible Electronics EMC design reviews are grounded in 40+ years of hands-on compliance testing — knowledge of which PCB layout patterns, filter designs, and interface architectures cause real products to fail FCC, CE, and international compliance testing, drawn directly from our NVLAP accredited test chambers.
An EMC design review is a proactive evaluation of your product's schematics, PCB layout, mechanical enclosure design, and cable/connector architecture — performed by experienced EMC engineers before hardware is fabricated. The goal is to identify design patterns likely to cause emissions or immunity problems during formal compliance testing, and to provide specific, actionable recommendations before the cost of hardware respins is incurred.
A Compatible Electronics design review produces a written engineering report with prioritized findings, applicable standard references, and mitigation recommendations — knowledge transfer to your design team based on established EMC engineering practices and direct test experience. It does not produce a compliance report and cannot be used for regulatory submissions.
⚠ Important Note: CETCB personnel cannot offer consulting and/or design services while at the same time providing TCB services. If clients wish to obtain TCB services, Compatible Electronics can submit the project to a third-party TCB while continuing to provide design review support.
Most impactful — layout issues corrected at zero hardware cost when caught at schematic stage.
Verify the planned respin addresses EMC findings before committing to fabrication cost.
Root cause analysis of failed compliance testing combined with layout/schematic review to identify the specific design change required.
First product in a family with unfamiliar EMC constraints — establish sound EMC design practices for the entire family.
Cost of a design review is recovered through reduced prototype iterations and test failures — especially valuable for high-volume designs.
A pre-layout schematic review for a 4-port Ethernet/RS-485 industrial IoT gateway identified that the specified AC mains common-mode choke had insufficient impedance at the 400 kHz switching frequency — providing less than 10 dB attenuation where 30+ dB was needed for EN 61000-6-4 compliance. The review also flagged incorrect isolation barrier capacitor grounding that created a common-mode noise return path on the RS-485 cable. Both issues were corrected before layout. The formal IEC 61326-1 conducted emissions test passed with 10 dB margin at the switching frequency fundamental.
A patient-connected diagnostic instrument failed IEC 61000-4-3 radiated RF immunity at 80 MHz during its IEC 60601-1-2 Ed. 4 submission. A post-failure schematic and layout review identified that the analog front-end high-gain amplifier lacked RF bypass filtering on its patient cable inputs — the cable acting as an antenna at 80 MHz. The review recommended specific RF bypass capacitors and a common-mode choke at the patient cable PCB entry point. The revised product passed IEC 61000-4-3 at 10 V/m professional healthcare facility levels on re-submission.
A pre-layout review of a Wi-Fi/Zigbee smart home controller identified five findings: crystal oscillator without ground guard ring, switching regulator output capacitors placed too far from the IC, USB port lacking close-proximity ESD protection, Ethernet magnetics with signal traces crossing ground splits, and an unfiltered enclosure slot aperture at the HDMI port. All five were corrected before first PCB fabrication. The product passed FCC Part 15B Class B and EN 55032 Class B radiated emissions on the first prototype — a single respin versus the typical two for this complexity level.
Findings grounded in direct observation of what causes real products to fail in our NVLAP accredited test chambers.
Engineers who have tested thousands of products and know which design patterns produce which test failures.
Each recommendation cites the applicable standard clause and test method — not generic advice.
Prioritized written report with annotated designs and specific mitigation suggestions for your design team.
Design review findings can be validated by pre-compliance testing at the same Southern California location.
Lake Forest/Silverado, Brea, Newbury Park — NVLAP Lab Code 200527-0.
Submit your schematic and PCB layout files to get started — written report with prioritized findings and mitigation recommendations.
Brea: 714‑579‑0500 · Newbury Park: 805‑480‑4044
www.celectronics.com